Skip to content

仓库 files navigation

PostCSS Benchmarks

Various benchmarks to have feedback about PostCSS perfomance.


  CSS Benchmark is built by Evil Martians, an American design and engineering consultancy for developer tools, AI, and cybersecurity startups.


All results below was run on Node 20.3.1, Github 操作:

Preprocessors

比较 CSS processors for parsings, nested rules, mixins, variables and math:

PostCSS sync:   70 ms  (1.0 times faster)
PostCSS:        72 ms
LibSass sync:   118 ms (1.6 times slower)
LibSass:        123 ms (1.7 times slower)
Less:           139 ms (1.9 times slower)
Dart Sass sync: 219 ms (3.0 times slower)
Dart Sass:      397 ms (5.5 times slower)

To get results on your environment:

pnpm install
pnpm test preprocessors

Parsers

比较 CSS parsers written on JS:

Stylis:       15 ms  (1.8 times faster)
CSSOM:        24 ms  (1.2 times faster)
PostCSS:      28 ms
CSSTree:      37 ms  (1.3 times slower)
Mensch:       37 ms  (1.3 times slower)
Rework:       49 ms  (1.8 times slower)
Stylecow:     73 ms  (2.6 times slower)
PostCSS Full: 95 ms  (3.4 times slower)
ParserLib:    153 ms (5.5 times slower)
Gonzales:     177 ms (6.4 times slower)

To get results on your environment:

pnpm install
pnpm test parsers

Prefixers

比较 vendor prefixes tools:

Lightning CSS: 12 ms   (7.7 times faster)
Stylis:        18 ms   (5.3 times faster)
Autoprefixer:  96 ms
Stylecow:      1009 ms (10.5 times slower)

To get results on your environment:

pnpm install
pnpm test prefixers

关于

PostCSS benchmarks

Resources

Stars

116 stars

关注者

6 watching

复刻s

发布

Sponsor this project

Used by

贡献者

Languages