Add method Selection::havingOr - #243
Conversation
|
Hello, David. Does this look good to you? I will eventually solve the currently present issues, I hope. I'm in a hurry now though. Sidenote: I spent unnecessary time to find out how to run the tests so that most of them are not skipped... May I suggest adding a brief info for other devs how to run the tests? |
|
Another sidenote: I was wondering why are the two methods ( |
Thanks, it looks great!
That would be great, I don't realize these things. Maybe add it to a the file
Unfortunately, I don't know, I'm not an author. It could be unified, but I don't know how big a BC break would be. |
f9fc19d to
dd75e74
比较
cce6a9c to
7e705c5
比较
9acf825 to
a268c60
比较
a56e7fe to
d9b5f29
比较
f016c33 to
6596c77
比较
a9e5763 to
c3cc31a
比较
e91b234 to
953502b
比较
f8de9c7 to
52d72e1
比较
07bedd3 to
d87063e
比较
e29b33b to
ba62a2a
比较
f8e1e59 to
4862e4d
比较
2986f4e to
a8541e0
比较
a7aaa31 to
ea8d97b
比较
havingOr? #240)Adds
Selection::havingOrmethod analogously to theSelection::whereOr, refactoring the common logic into a separate protected method (Selection::paramsOr).closes #240