docs: rust: fix formatting for kernel::block::mq::Request - #1111
Conversation
|
If possible, I would like to receive a review of this patch. In particular, on the way I configured the Makefiles to pass the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is nice adding the explanation, but I think we should also keep the original sentence.
This should be an independent commit, too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you! I have removed these changes from the commit. Should I submit them as a second PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You're welcome! I think they would be 3 independent PRs, since they are mostly independent (i.e. the cleanup, the docs improvement and the proposal to document private items; the latter likely being an RFC). In any case, please note that each change that you want to submit will need to end up in the mailing list -- we don't really use PRs anymore, except for early reviews like this one. Thanks!
Fix several issues with rustdoc formatting for the `kernel::block::mq::Request` module, in particular: - An ordered list not rendering correctly. - Code snippets formatted as regular text. - References to types missing intra-doc links. Closes: Rust-for-Linux#1108 Signed-off-by: Francesco Zardi <frazar00@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
c9b5ce6 to
ce1c54f
比较
9ee7197 to
6ce162a
比较
bfc3cd8 to
a3b2347
比较
5d132fa to
3b83f5d
比较
fcb1014 to
3a2486c
比较
7c678ba to
438700e
比较
4fedd76 to
759da9e
比较
4cb8438 to
d8973c4
比较
a417b54 to
47f2715
比较
Fix several issues with rustdoc formatting for the
kernel::block::mq::Requestmodule, in particular:An ordered list not rendering correctly.
Code snippets formatted as regular text.
References to types missing intra-doc links.
Closes: #1108
Suggested-by: Miguel Ojeda ojeda@kernel.org